• Courses
      • Executive Management Courses
      • Global Series of National Privacy Laws
      • Netherlands Privacy Academy (in Dutch)
      • Caribbean Data Protection Academy
    • Resources
    • Join GADPPRO ACADEMY
      • Join GADPPRO Academy as an Official Partner
      • Become an Official GADPPRO Training Entity
      • Join the GADPPRO Business Academy
      • Secretariat & International Training Centre
      • Contact Us
    •  
      • RegisterLog in
    Privacad GADPPRO Academy
      • Courses
        • Executive Management Courses
        • Global Series of National Privacy Laws
        • Netherlands Privacy Academy (in Dutch)
        • Caribbean Data Protection Academy
      • Resources
      • Join GADPPRO ACADEMY
        • Join GADPPRO Academy as an Official Partner
        • Become an Official GADPPRO Training Entity
        • Join the GADPPRO Business Academy
        • Secretariat & International Training Centre
        • Contact Us
      •  
        • RegisterLog in

      Blog

      Guidelines 9/2020 on relevant and reasoned objection under Regulation 2016/679

      • Categories Blog, Business, Design / Branding, Free Data Protection Resources, Uncategorized
      • Date November 29, 2020

      Guidelines 9/2020 on relevant and reasoned objection under Regulation 2016/679

      SECTION 3  CONTENT OF THE OBJECTION

      23. The subject matter of the objection may refer to whether there is an infringement of the GDPR and/or to whether the envisaged action in relation of the controller or the processor complies with the GDPR. The type of content will depend on the specific draft decision at issue and on the circumstances of the case.

      24. Additionally, the CSA’s objection will have to clearly demonstrate the significance of the risks posed by the draft decision as regards the fundamental rights and freedoms of data subjects and, where applicable, the free flow of personal data within the Union. The existence of an infringement and/orthe non-compliance of the envisaged action should be assessed in light of the significance of the risks that the draft decision, if left unchanged, poses to the rights and freedoms of data subjects and, ifrelevant, the free flow of personal data.

      • Share:
      User Avatar
      Richard V

      Previous post

      Guidelines 9/2020 on relevant and reasoned objection under Regulation 2016/679
      November 29, 2020

      Next post

      Guidelines 9/2020 on relevant and reasoned objection under Regulation 2016/679
      November 29, 2020

      You may also like

      Children Safety Encryption www.privacad.com
      Apple’s New Step to Protect Child Abuse via Encryption Feature
      20 August, 2021
      DNA Technology and Privacy www.privacad.com
      DNA Technology Regulation Bill and Violation of Privacy for Minority Groups
      19 August, 2021
      www.privacad.com
      India accuses Twitter of not complying with new IT rules
      18 August, 2021

      Search

      Categories

      • Blog
      • Business
      • Design / Branding
      • Free Data Protection Resources
      • Nederlandse Privacy Academie
      • Uncategorized
      Facebook-f Linkedin-in

      © Privacad 2020

      For all your questions about courses

      students@privacad.com

      For all your questions about Privacad for business

      info@privacad.com

      Links

      • Courses
      • Become a GADPPRO Academy Official Training Entity
      • Resources
      • Free Data Protection Resources
      • Blog
      • Profile
      • Students Stewards Network (SSN)

      Support

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
      • FAQs
      • Contact

      © GADPPRO Academy | Privacad 2023

      GADPPRO Academy 2023

      Login with your site account

      Lost your password?

      Not a member yet? Register now

      Register a new account

      Are you a member? Login now